A proposed class-action lawsuit in federal court alleges horse racing is rigged to benefit a select few The litigation claims computer-assisted wagering platform wrongs ordinary bettors A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in New York’s Eastern District Court against several of the horse racing industry’s biggest players levies allegations that the companies have colluded to rig betting outcomes through computer-assisted wagering (CAW) schemes. Elegant hats and fancy attire are pictured at a horse race. A lawsuit filed in federal court claims that betting on horse racing is rigged to benefit a select few, including the tracks and their cohorts. (Image: Shutterstock) Hagens Berman, a Seattle-based nationally recognized law firm known for its class-action lawsuits, filed the complaint in New York on behalf of lead plaintiff Ryan Dickey and other similarly situated individuals. Dickey is a Colorado resident with an extensive history of wagering on thoroughbred racing for the past two decades. Dickey claims to have previously resided in Kentucky, where he…Read MoreCategory: Horse Racing, AmTote, Churchill Downs, Elite Turf Club, horse betting, Horse racing, New York Racing, NYRA, parimutuel, racing, Stronach Group, TwinSpires, VelocitySource: Casino.org